Failure of the Arab League

In the wake of some(prenominal) spacious conflict, states volition try and assemble a dust that is establish on unity and prevention of further conflict, in that respect be some(prenominal) aspects usu solelyy addressed, including the economic system and the international relations. In the wake of World war 2 the UN assembled to form the new world order (Pinfari, 1. ) In the shopping m tout ensemble East, 6 founding sections (Egypt, Transjordan, Saudi-Arabian Arabia, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq) organize the Arab coalition, an organization founded upon a commonalty disposition of Arabism with a goal of Arab unity (Pinfari, 2.) In the wake of the inhuman War, Africa found itself at a political disadvantage beca pulmonary tuberculosis of the fragmented governing of the continent, they were at a geographical advantage and wanted to make use of that, so they formed the Afri laughingstock heart to address inner-conflicts and the mayhem caused by the remains of colonialism later on the Cold War (Dersso, 13-14. ) On the early(a) military position of things the European partnership formed in the late 1990s with a unlike delegacy in mind when compargond to the two aforeabmenti unrivaledd organizations.The Arab federation and the African Unions boots were more(prenominal) thought-provoking than those of other political organizations untold(prenominal) as the EU and the UN, due to m any reasons why this paper allow for focus on discussing their economy, their judiciary and the effect of pan-Arpabism and a pan-African perspective. When nations group to a lower place atomic number 53 monetary standard as is the font in the examples mentioned, the issue of their singular political sovereignty is brought into the foreground as countries value their autonomy.The European Union is more of a inwardness in the judiciary virtuoso than the Arab union while the Arab confederation clearly states in its carry that the conference has no right to come in in the internal affairs of a sh ar country unless their boilers suit safety is compromised, this then makes mood for dictators like Qaddafi to witness for years in what certain scholars would view as a dogmatic manner.The judiciary of distributively country is dis tie in from the Arab League which isnt the case with the EU, whereby the Court of arbiter of the European Union has the right to supersede any national salute of law (Wallace, 484), by so doing maintaining peace in a more efficient way. How does this make the Arab Leagues rush more aspiring(prenominal), is that they argon seeking peace and unity ground on a sense of Arabism rather than an effective judicial system (Reiser, 1), and it is ambitious to assume that this will prevail.When discussing the Organization of African Unity (OAU), their kick can also be seen as more ambitious than that of the EU, the OAUs mission was to establish far-flung security and unity mingled with African processs of thi s union through the rarefied of African Solutions for African problems, nonwithstanding like the Arab League, their mission contains certain clauses that are emphasized in discourse, yet not much is done to re-en issue them (Dersso, 13), and much the governments of individual states will do as they please, as is the case with the Rwanda racial extermination in 1994,with no higher judicial force to intervene, and that is where they fail (Tavares, 23.)Africa only should not be grouped with the Arab League, even though they are comparable, because after the Cold War, Africa had been depleted because of their atom into pro-USA forces and pro-Soviet forces during the Cold War, as they to a lower placewent a take of proxy wars for the USA and the Soviet Union. After having served their economic consumption Africa was then handle and faced with indifference from forces that had had an increasing interest in it before (Dersso, 15.)When discussing the economy in that respect are also rather ambitious initiatives on the AL and the OAUs parts, in their missions they strive for unity, but one of the main constituents of verbalise unity, is economic unity, whereby portion states implement policies that will be beneficial to one anothers economies as is the case with the EU, they consecrate a integrated currency and an open market, whereby, goods, services and people are not taxed when traded between members.The EU is the only Regional Insisution with a separate monetary system which makes , the EU has become greater than merely an champaign of inter-state co-operation and has taken on many state-like powers (Bradbury 18). This however does not work with the Arab League, because of the pretermit of a constitution which dictates the existence of such a market but also because of the division in wealth in the set East, oil-rich states such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar control the capital and give bullion to the poorer members such as Egypt, in excha nge for one thing that Egypt has in abundance bear on and cheap labor at that (Korany, 279.)Also how can the Arab League hope to contact such unity when travelling between member states alleviate requires visas and there are assuage taxes on products traded between member states? Again, the mission is ambitious with no real actions taken to implement. As for the OAU, the member states are still very much in conflict as is evident by Africas human rights violations and constant violence. After all , Africa is simply in any case large and divided to ever fit under one banner.After all, overcoming colonialism is not simple North Africa is an attest to that, with French beingness a liberal language, even though it was the tongue of their colonizers. In the Arab Leagues charter there is a clause which dictates that states in belligerence shall be compel into deliberations by the League itself and shall receive a bulk vote on what they are expected to do, the leagues determinat ion shall then be effective and obligatory.This however, did not seem like a viable clause as there pay been many conflicts between states in the Arab League and interventions were long and tedious and ultimately rendered useless, when there are clauses and no way to implement them, then it is ambitious to place them in the charter in the first place. The importance of pan-Arabism and pan-Africanism is also note-worthy.Pan-Arabism started in the Middle East with leadership like Egypts Gamal Abdel Nasser and his nationalistic sentiment it is a concept which dictates that Arab nations should unite because of a shared Arab identity (Reiser, 1983. ) Ever since pan-Arabism was introduced, Arabs have been asking themselves what it stands for and what is it based on (Reiser, 1983), it was the leaders ambition, one that was evidently misplaced as the citizens of member states dont see each other as Arab, rather, Egyptian, Syrian, Lebanese etc.One also begins to ponder the role of colonia lism here different nations have colonise the members of the Arab League, for example Egypt was colonized Britain and France, Libya by Italy, North Africa by France and Jordan by Britain, there are remnants of these cultures in these countries, and hence there is a difference in psyche and a difference in identity.Pan-Arabism and pan-Africanism are both supposedly built on an identitarian principle yet hall argues that identity outsmart created through discourse, its not a changeless entity but a process that is incomplete and is reproduced through process (Hall 16). This same problem exists in Africa and pan-Africanism has the same logical holes in it, African states were and still are very much divided (as I have mentioned previously), so how can they all exist under one African umbrella? Hence, the Arab League fails (Pinfari, 1. ) The OAU fails.Failure of the Arab LeagueIn the wake of any great conflict, states will try and assemble a system that is based on unity and preven tion of further conflict, there are several aspects normally addressed, including the economy and the international relations. In the wake of World War 2 the UN assembled to form the new world order (Pinfari, 1. ) In the Middle East, 6 founding members (Egypt, Transjordan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq) formed the Arab League, an organization founded upon a common sense of Arabism with a goal of Arab unity (Pinfari, 2.)In the wake of the Cold War, Africa found itself at a political disadvantage because of the fragmented politics of the continent, they were at a geographical advantage and wanted to make use of that, so they formed the African Union to address inner-conflicts and the mayhem caused by the remains of colonialism after the Cold War (Dersso, 13-14. ) On the other side of things the European Union formed in the late 1990s with a different mission in mind when compared to the two aforeabmentioned organizations.The Arab League and the African Unions missions were mor e ambitious than those of other political organizations such as the EU and the UN, due to many reasons why this paper will focus on discussing their economy, their judiciary and the effect of pan-Arpabism and a pan-African perspective. When nations group under one banner as is the case in the examples mentioned, the issue of their individual political sovereignty is brought into the foreground as countries value their autonomy.The European Union is more of a union in the judiciary sense than the Arab League while the Arab League clearly states in its charter that the League has no right to intervene in the internal affairs of a member country unless their overall safety is compromised, this then makes way for dictators like Qaddafi to rule for years in what certain scholars would view as a tyrannical manner.The judiciary of each country is separate from the Arab League which isnt the case with the EU, whereby the Court of Justice of the European Union has the right to supersede any national court of law (Wallace, 484), by so doing maintaining peace in a more efficient way. How does this make the Arab Leagues mission more ambitious, is that they are seeking peace and unity based on a sense of Arabism rather than an effective judicial system (Reiser, 1), and it is ambitious to assume that this will prevail.When discussing the Organization of African Unity (OAU), their mission can also be seen as more ambitious than that of the EU, the OAUs mission was to establish widespread security and unity between African members of this union through the ideal of African Solutions for African problems, but like the Arab League, their mission contains certain clauses that are emphasized in discourse, yet not much is done to re-enforce them (Dersso, 13), and often the governments of individual states will do as they please, as is the case with the Rwanda genocide in 1994,with no higher judicial force to intervene, and that is where they fail (Tavares, 23.)Africa however shoul d not be grouped with the Arab League, even though they are comparable, because after the Cold War, Africa had been depleted because of their division into pro-USA forces and pro-Soviet forces during the Cold War, as they underwent a number of proxy wars for the USA and the Soviet Union. After having served their purpose Africa was then disregarded and faced with indifference from forces that had had an increasing interest in it before (Dersso, 15.)When discussing the economy there are also rather ambitious initiatives on the AL and the OAUs parts, in their missions they strive for unity, but one of the main constituents of said unity, is economic unity, whereby member states implement policies that will be beneficial to one anothers economies as is the case with the EU, they have a unified currency and an open market, whereby, goods, services and people are not taxed when traded between members.The EU is the only Regional Insisution with a separate monetary system which makes , the EU has become greater than merely an arena of inter-state co-operation and has taken on many state-like powers (Bradbury 18). This however does not work with the Arab League, because of the lack of a policy which dictates the existence of such a market but also because of the division in wealth in the Middle East, oil-rich states such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar control the capital and give money to the poorer members such as Egypt, in exchange for one thing that Egypt has in abundance labor and cheap labor at that (Korany, 279.)Also how can the Arab League hope to achieve such unity when travelling between member states still requires visas and there are still taxes on products traded between member states? Again, the mission is ambitious with no real actions taken to implement. As for the OAU, the member states are still very much in conflict as is evident by Africas human rights violations and constant violence. After all , Africa is simply too large and divided to ever fi t under one banner.After all, overcoming colonialism is not simple North Africa is an attest to that, with French being a prominent language, even though it was the tongue of their colonizers. In the Arab Leagues charter there is a clause which dictates that states in aggression shall be forced into deliberations by the League itself and shall receive a majority vote on what they are expected to do, the leagues decision shall then be effective and obligatory.This however, did not seem like a viable clause as there have been many conflicts between states in the Arab League and interventions were long and tedious and ultimately rendered useless, when there are clauses and no way to implement them, then it is ambitious to place them in the charter in the first place. The importance of pan-Arabism and pan-Africanism is also note-worthy.Pan-Arabism started in the Middle East with leaders like Egypts Gamal Abdel Nasser and his nationalistic sentiment it is a concept which dictates that Ar ab nations should unite because of a shared Arab identity (Reiser, 1983. ) Ever since pan-Arabism was introduced, Arabs have been asking themselves what it stands for and what is it based on (Reiser, 1983), it was the leaders ambition, one that was evidently misplaced as the citizens of member states dont see each other as Arab, rather, Egyptian, Syrian, Lebanese etc.One also begins to ponder the role of colonialism here different nations have colonized the members of the Arab League, for example Egypt was colonized Britain and France, Libya by Italy, North Africa by France and Jordan by Britain, there are remnants of these cultures in these countries, and hence there is a difference in psyche and a difference in identity.Pan-Arabism and pan-Africanism are both supposedly built on an identitarian principle yet Hall argues that identity get created through discourse, its not a stable entity but a process that is incomplete and is reproduced through process (Hall 16). This same proble m exists in Africa and pan-Africanism has the same logical holes in it, African states were and still are very much divided (as I have mentioned previously), so how can they all exist under one African umbrella? Hence, the Arab League fails (Pinfari, 1. ) The OAU fails.